Widow devastated as judge rules her $280,000 home will be sold over unpaid $6.30 tax bill


A woman is losing her home at the hands of a judge because she failed to pay tax interest of $6.30

eileen battisti

Battisti, 53, of Aliquippa, lost legal rights to her $280,000 home over two years ago after failing to pay the paltry sum but has made multiple appeals on grounds she did not know it was owed. The most recent decision made last week denied her request to reverse the September 2011 sale of a house she is still reportedly living in.

‘I paid everything, and didn’t know about the $6.30,’ Battisti said. ‘For the house to be sold just because of $6.30 is crazy.’

She had previously owed other taxes, the court noted, but at the time of the sale she owed just $235, including other interest and fees. Beaver County Common Pleas Judge Gus Kwidis wrote in his ruling that the county tax claim bureau complied with notification requirements in state law before the auction.

‘There is no doubt that (she) had actual receipt of the notification of the tax upset sale on July 7, 2011, and Aug. 16, 2011,’ the judge wrote. ‘Moreover, on Aug. 12, 2011, a notice of sale was sent by first class mail and was not returned.’

Battisti also admitted to receiving those notices, the judge asserted, according to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review.
He write in the ruling there “is no doubt’ Battisti “had actual receipt” of them. The property sold for about $116,000, and she is entitled to $108,039 if subsequent appeals are unsuccessful, according to the paper.

‘She’s going to get that money, but she’s going to lose her house. All the notice requirements were met,’ wrote Kwidis. ‘In tax assessment laws, even if I feel sorry for her, I can’t do anything to help her.

Sometimes I imagine that punching lawyers, judges and government officials in the face would feel real nice.

Also,
Dayton man charged with physical assault and rape of a female puppy called ‘Sissy’

Related Articles

2

“The world’s geekiest license plates”

“This slideshow is filled with images of: vanity plates so geeky: that they prompted someone else to take a picture and post

The Ultimate Third Party Candidate

Had this third party candidate had the money to run more commercials, he might have siphoned enough votes away from

Answering Michael Moore’s Question To Bill O’Reilly

Michael Moore and Bill O’Reilly had a conversation/interview/confrontation, whatever you want to call it, and Moore kept pounding away at