WARNING: If you read this you will want to punch someone, make sure you’re not at work in front of your boss. Did you know that some university academics make the case to defend child molestors for their sexual urges toward children? Last July paedophiles were given a pass for their natural desire for children in summer conferences at the University of Cambridge.
“Paedophilic interest is natural and normal for human males,” said the presentation. “At least a sizeable minority of normal males would like to have sex with children … Normal males are aroused by children.”
Some yellowing tract from the Seventies or early Eighties, era of abusive celebrities and the infamous PIE, the Paedophile Information Exchange? No. Anonymous commenters on some underground website? No again.
The statement that paedophilia is “natural and normal” was made not three decades ago but last July. It was made not in private but as one of the central claims of an academic presentation delivered, at the invitation of the organisers, to many of the key experts in the field at a conference held by the University of Cambridge.
Other presentations included “Liberating the paedophile: a discursive analysis,” and “Danger and difference: the stakes of hebephilia.”
Hebephilia is the sexual preference for children in early puberty, typically 11 to 14-year-olds.
Another attendee, and enthusiastic participant from the floor, was one Tom O’Carroll, a multiple child sex offender, long-time campaigner for the legalisation of sex with children and former head of the Paedophile Information Exchange. “Wonderful!” he wrote on his blog afterwards. “It was a rare few days when I could feel relatively popular!”
The idea that normal men naturally find little children sexually desirable is ludicrous to be taught in any University. This can only lead to giving men a pass to take away the liberty of a smaller indefensible individual through rape and possibly slavery which occurs at a higher rate around the world than you would expect. I am aghast that sexual predators can disregard personal choice and campaign for the legalization of sex with children. How does a child explain their violation or rape when they have been manipulated to believe it’s okay or necessary? Sex with children is straight up rape and no University should be allowed open discussion on the legalization thereof!