Follow Me on Pinterest
Latest Pins:
For Advertising Info, Write.
Premium Left blogad
The Republican Squishes Create Their Post-Election Narrative: “Blame Palin!”

Written By : John Hawkins
October 27, 2008

Given our current situation, it’s deeply ironic that moderate Republicans spent the last few years completely ignoring conservative concerns and insisting that if only the dumb right-wingers would listen to them, they’d create a majority that would last for 40 years.


Let’s see, there was Campaign Finance Reform, the Medicare Prescription Drug Program, No Child Left Behind, The Gang-of-14, Harriet Miers, the Dubai Port Deal, illegal immigration, out-of-control earmarking, deficit spending, the bailout, and probably another half dozen different disasters that I’m blocking out because they’re too painful to think about.
Then, after all of that, these RINOS helped to nominate the least conservative GOP nominee since Richard Nixon and only a few months later, many of those same people turned right around and supported his opponent, the most liberal Democratic nominee in American history.

You know their names: Lincoln Chafee, William Weld, Colin Powell, Christopher Buckley, Wayne Gilchrest, Richard Riordan, Douglas Kmiec, Scott McClellan, Ken Adelman, & Michael Smerconish among others.

At least one of them should have the common decency to reprise that great line from Animal House,

“(Y)ou can’t spend your whole life worrying about your mistakes! You (screwed) up – you trusted us! Hey, make the best of it!”

But, no, the very same people who systematically, methodically advocated positions that have destroyed the Republican brand with the American people are once again preparing to deflect the blame if John McCain loses the election.

There are a couple of stories out there that foreshadow the “blame Palin” strategy they’re going to use to do it. The first is from” TARGET=”_blank”>David Frum spinning the squish narrative with a bit more specificity,

So in August, McCain tried a bold new gambit: He would reach out to independents and women with an exciting and unexpected vice presidential choice.

That didn’t work out so well either. Gov. Sarah Palin connected with neither independents nor women. She did, however, ignite the Republican base, which has come to support her passionately. And so, in this last month, the McCain campaign has Palinized itself to make the most of its last asset. To fire up the Republican base, the McCain team has hit at Barack Obama as an alien, a radical and a socialist.

Sure enough, the base has responded. After months and months of wan enthusiasm among Republicans, these last weeks have at last energized the core of the party. But there’s a downside: The very same campaign strategy that has belatedly mobilized the Republican core has alienated and offended the great national middle, which was the only place where the 2008 election could have been won.

…The themes and messages that are galvanizing the crowds for Palin are bleeding Sens. John Sununu in New Hampshire, Gordon Smith in Oregon, Norm Coleman in Minnesota and Susan Collins in Maine. The Palin approach might have been expected to work better in more traditionally conservative states such as Virginia, North Carolina and Georgia, but they have not worked well enough to compensate for the weak Republican economic message at a moment of global financial crisis. Result: the certain loss of John Warner’s Senate seat in Virginia, the probable loss of Elizabeth Dole’s in North Carolina, an unexpectedly tough fight for Saxby Chambliss’s in Georgia — and an apparent GOP surrender in Colorado, where it looks as if the National Republican Senatorial Committee has already pulled its ads from the air.

The problem with this is that practically every word of it is designed to be deceptive, including the “of’s” and “the’s.” The senators he names that are in trouble? They’ve been in trouble all year long. Furthermore, the campaign hasn’t been negative because it has been “Palinized;” it has been negative because McCain doesn’t have enough credibility on conservative issues like gay marriage, Affirmative Action, illegal immigration, and deficit spending to eviscerate Obama with them. When you’re behind and you don’t have any positive issues to get you over the top, you have no other choice but to go negative. Furthermore, it was McCain’s support for the bailout, not his selection of Palin — who has been an asset and a breath of fresh air — that caused his campaign to crater.

Incidentally, some of us predicted exactly that outcome. Here’s what I wrote back on was telling me the calls to his office were running 100-to-1 against the bailout, so it didn’t exactly take Nostradamus to figure out it was a bad idea politically. Besides, anybody who understands conservatives knew it would be a disaster if McCain signed on to the bailout because the Republican base hates socialism and they loathe deficit spending. So, how can a candidate — who’s keeping conservatives on board primarily via his reputation for fiscal conservatism — possibly sign onto a socialistic, 700 billion dollar bailout with a month to go before the end of the election without having his campaign take a major hit as a result?

So, why doesn’t Frum see this? Well,

Comments are closed.

Featured Video

Tom Cotton Ad: “At Ease”

php developer india
Around The Web
Previous Features


The 10 Best Tea Party Signs So Far
Interviewing Six Conservative Women On Dating
5 Things That Will Happen To You When America Goes Bankrupt
Five Things Children Know That Liberals Have Forgotten
The Worst Of Barack Obama In Quotes (87 Quotes)
A Real Man’s Responsibilities
User Info