Could the world’s most pro-life court be in Germany?


By now, you’ve all heard this story:

Circumcising young boys on religious grounds amounts to grievous bodily harm, a German court ruled Tuesday in a landmark decision that the Jewish community said trampled on parents’ religious rights.

The regional court in Cologne, western Germany, ruled that the “fundamental right of the child to bodily integrity outweighed the fundamental rights of the parents”, a judgement [sic] that is expected to set a legal precedent.

Reaction has been mainly in the “government intrusion on parental and religious rights” variety. But maybe we should take a slightly different view. Maybe we should hope this court uses the same logic on other controversial “procedures.”

Maybe we should start referring to abortion as “full fetal circumcision.”

“The religious freedom of the parents and their right to educate their child would not be unacceptably compromised, if they were obliged to wait until the child could himself decide to be circumcised,” the court added.

Indeed, and perhaps we should also wait until “the child could himself decide to be aborted.” Seems only fair, doesn’t it? He’s the one most affected. If the simple act of having a foreskin removed is such an affront to the baby’s personal rights – his right to personhood – surely a court would extend that to the baby’s life.

(Posted by The TrogloPundit.)

Also see...

Related Articles

The GOP’s Political Fortunes Take A Turn For The Worse

During this whole cycle, I’ve been more optimistic than most people about the GOP’s chances, but based on the last

4

Democrats Unleash Ads Focusing on Rivals’ Pasts

Cross-posted from American Power. ********** At New York Times (via Memeorandum, iOWNTHEWORLD, and Pirate’s Cove): Democratic candidates across the country

The Republicans Make ‘Em Think It’s Hell On The House Floor Over Gas Prices

“I never give them hell. I just tell the truth and they think it’s hell.” — Harry Truman The most