Could the world’s most pro-life court be in Germany?


By now, you’ve all heard this story:

Circumcising young boys on religious grounds amounts to grievous bodily harm, a German court ruled Tuesday in a landmark decision that the Jewish community said trampled on parents’ religious rights.

The regional court in Cologne, western Germany, ruled that the “fundamental right of the child to bodily integrity outweighed the fundamental rights of the parents”, a judgement [sic] that is expected to set a legal precedent.

Reaction has been mainly in the “government intrusion on parental and religious rights” variety. But maybe we should take a slightly different view. Maybe we should hope this court uses the same logic on other controversial “procedures.”

Maybe we should start referring to abortion as “full fetal circumcision.”

“The religious freedom of the parents and their right to educate their child would not be unacceptably compromised, if they were obliged to wait until the child could himself decide to be circumcised,” the court added.

Indeed, and perhaps we should also wait until “the child could himself decide to be aborted.” Seems only fair, doesn’t it? He’s the one most affected. If the simple act of having a foreskin removed is such an affront to the baby’s personal rights – his right to personhood – surely a court would extend that to the baby’s life.

(Posted by The TrogloPundit.)

Related Articles

If The Israelis Really Wanted Peace, They’d All Commit Suicide

Here’s Allah imagining what Thomas Friedman’s newest peace plan for the Middle-East will look like, “…(T)here are only two possible

58

California Dem convicted of 8 felonies; Democrats block expulsion

It’s time for yet another game of “Imagine if this were a Republican!” Republicans are usually quick to condemn and

What Other Supreme Court Justices Will Be Retiring? The Rumor Mill…

You think the Democrats are gnashing their teeth over Sandra Day O’Connor being replaced on the Supreme Court? If this