« Conservative Grapevine Promo | Main | The Debut Of Right Wing News Radio »
September 02, 2008
John Hawkins Who Really Should Have Had Better Vetting: Palin Or Obama?

The New York Times ran a snotty piece speculating about whether McCain properly vetted Palin.

Well, let's do a little comparison of "scandals" between Palin and Obama and see who really needed to be vetted.

Palin: Her husband had a drunk driving conviction a couple of decades ago.
Obama: He used cocaine a couple of decades ago and hopefully hasn't used it since.
Palin: She has a 17 year old daughter who's pregnant. The daughter is going to have the baby and marry the father.
Obama: Famously said he wouldn't want his daughters "...if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby."
Palin: She's accused of trying to get a brother-in-law who mistreated her sister and threatened her father fired.
Obama: Has a brother living in a hut that he does nothing for.
Palin: Was a member for two years of the "Alaska Independence Party," which had some members that supported secession and produced the governor of the state of Alaska in 1990.
Obama: Was a member of an anti-white, anti-American church for 20 years.

I think that clearly the person who wasn't well vetted enough here, by the mainstream media and by his own supporters, was Barack Obama. Update #1: Apparently, Sarah Palin was not actually a member of the American Independence Party. However, Obama was pals with Jeremiah Wright and did attend his racist, anti-American church for roughly two decades. Palin 1. Obama. 0.
Advertisement
Featured Video

Debbie Spend-it-now is selling America’s future to the Chinese

php developer india
Previous Features

Ads

Five Ways Conservatives Will Have to Sell Their Souls if Romney Wins
An Interview With Ron Paul
The RWN Real-Estate Sale
RWN\'s Favorite Tony Robbins Quotes
Stop Apologizing for Being an American
The Amway Experience
Premium Right Ads
Blogads Right
Advertisement
User Info