ad banner for Stop B.O.
AdvertisingConservative GrapevineEmailFAQHomeForumRSSYouTubeTownhall
 
Repelling raving moonbats since 2001.



« Conservative Grapevine Promo | Main | The Wright Story: What Took So Long »
May 08, 2008
John Hawkins The New York Times On Judges

Some people believe that liberals and conservatives are just flip sides of the same coin when it comes to the judiciary, but that's not so. Conservatives believe judges should adhere to the original intent of the Constitution and not try to usurp the role of the legislature. On the other hand most liberals care little about the Constitution and view judges as just another way to advance left-wing policies.

Quotes like the following, from the New York Times, help give the game away,

"Mr. McCain predictably criticized liberal judges, vowed strict adherence to the Founders’ views and promised to appoint more judges in the mold of Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito. That is just what the country does not need." -- The New York Times via Newsbusters

So, among other things, judges with "strict adherence to the Founders’ views" are "just what the country does not need?" That's like saying, "Umpires who impartially do their job, without favor to either team, are just what this sport doesn't need."

Rate this article:

Rating: 1.5/5 (2 votes cast)

BlinklistBlogMarksdel.icio.usDiggFurlMagnoliaNewsvineRedditStumbleuponTechnorati
    Share this article!
John Hawkins | 07:36 AM | Permalink   Comments (29)   Trackbacks (0)

Note: Comments and Trackbacks for this entry closed on May 13, 2008 07:36 AM Most commented on recent posts
  Live Blogging The Vice Presidential Debate (138 comments)
  VP Debate Moderator Gwen Ifill Is Over-the-Top Obamunist (126 comments)
  AP: It's Racist to Mention Obama's Terrorist Ties (124 comments)
  Parents Propagandizing Their Children (83 comments)
  Gwen Ifill & The Sorry State Of American Journalism (76 comments)
  Bill Defeated! Thank Goodness For The Congressmen Who Kept Their Heads (75 comments)
  A Short Debate Analysis: The Winner Is... (71 comments)
  How McCain's Botched Response To The Bailout Crisis Is Killing His Campaign (67 comments)
  Taking Sarah Palin Derangement Syndrome To Its Natural Conclusion (63 comments)
  Bailout vote: The "Nays" have it (57 comments)

Highest rated recent posts
  Krugman Gets P3wned On Canadian Health Care [4.5 stars]
  Video Of The Day: Why I Am A Democrat [4.4 stars]
  Term Limits And The Bailout [4.3 stars]
  Black Conservative on Obama - No We Can't! [4.3 stars]
  Announcing The RightBlogs' Slate [4.2 stars]
  Cynthia McKinney: Government Murdered 5,000 People During Katrina And Dumped Them In A Swamp [4.2 stars]
  You Might Be a Nihilist If ... [4.1 stars]
  Video Of The Day: The Opening Of Idiocracy [4.1 stars]
  Reid's Irresponsible Lie Costs Insurance Industry a Fortune [4.1 stars]
  How McCain's Botched Response To The Bailout Crisis Is Killing His Campaign [4.1 stars]
  The Huffington Post: The Bailout Is A Secret Coup! Revolution! [4.1 stars]

ad banner for Survey
© Copyright 2001-2008 John Hawkins
eXTReMe Tracker