ad banner for Labor Day Moneybomb!
AdvertisingConservative GrapevineEmailFAQHomeRSSYouTubeTownhall
9/11/2001 -- We won't forget or forgive.



« The Website Of The Day Is Eyeblast TV | Main | Conservative Grapevine Promo »
April 22, 2008
John Hawkins Surprise: "Islamic Scholars" Say Mecca Is At Zero Longitude

So, if any Canadian bloggers point out that there's even less science behind this than there is behind manmade global warming, will they be brought up on hate crime charges?

SPEAKERS at a Doha conference on Mecca's importance said that the holy city, not Greenwich, should become the reference point for world time, reigniting an old controversy that started some four decades ago.

A group of Islamic scholars presented on Saturday “scientific evidence” to prove that Mecca was the core of that the zero longitude passes through the holy city and not through Greenwich in the UK.

Greenwich in England has been the home of Greenwich Mean Time (GMT) since 1884. GMT is sometimes called Greenwich Meridian Time because it is measured from the Greenwich Meridian Line at the Royal Observatory in Greenwich. Greenwich is the place from where all time zones are measured.

In a clear support for the call, Islamic scholar Yousuf al-Qaradawi said Islam, “unlike other religions, never contradicted science”.

The participants recommended the unification of the time in the Arab world to the time in Mecca instead of Greenwich. They also called the Arab governments to abandon the new world maps “because they are forged to serve Western interests.”

They also demanded that buildings in the Arab world be directed towards Qibla.

The very fact that these idiots weren't laughed out of the room shows you why the term "Islamic scholars" has been an oxymoron for several hundred years now -- and that's actually sad. At one point in time, Middle Eastern Muslims were on the cutting edge of science. But, today? Their societies are so stagnant and backwards that they're trying to re-fight battles that were settled everywhere else in the world more than 120 years ago.

Rate this article:

Rating: 3.0/5 (2 votes cast)

BlinklistBlogMarksdel.icio.usDiggFurlMagnoliaNewsvineRedditStumbleuponTechnorati
    Share this article!
John Hawkins | 05:11 AM | Permalink   Comments (40)   Trackbacks (0)

Note: Comments and Trackbacks for this entry closed on April 27, 2008 05:11 AM Most commented on recent posts
  AP: It's Racist to Mention Obama's Terrorist Ties (140 comments)
  The Impending Obama Thugocracy (137 comments)
  Obama Funny Business (136 comments)
  Liveblogging The Presidential Debate (129 comments)
  Who is Barack Obama, and what does he stand for? (76 comments)
  Ok, Not To Depress You, But... (75 comments)
  Barack Obama Was a Member of Radical Left New Party (71 comments)
  Q&A Friday #95 (58 comments)
  "In 100 Words Or Less: What's Wrong With The World?" (54 comments)
  Obama's New 400 Billion Dollar Welfare Program (54 comments)

Highest rated recent posts
  So That's What Community Organizers Do [4.5 stars]
  Why McCain Is Still Pushing Hard In Pennsylvania [4.4 stars]
  Barack Obama In Quotes Version 3.0 [4.3 stars]
  Obama's New 400 Billion Dollar Welfare Program [4.2 stars]
  Thoughts on the Politics of the Financial Crisis [4.1 stars]
  Intellectualism & Sarah Palin: Or How The Smarty Pants Set Are Threatened By Someone Who Knows Sense [4.1 stars]
  Video Of The Day: The Vote Reaper [4.1 stars]
  Goodbye to the "Honeymoon" Concept Regarding the Presidency. [4.1 stars]
  The Law of Unintended Consequences Strikes Again [4.1 stars]
  The slow dawning [4.0 stars]
  A Short Debate Analysis Of The 2nd McCain Vs. Obama Debate. [3.9 stars]

ad banner for Survey
© Copyright 2001-2008 John Hawkins
eXTReMe Tracker