What could any infidel say to hurt the reputation of Islam worse than what Muslims like these say about their own faith?

"A question-and-answer session with Imam Abdul Makin in an East London mosque asks why Allah would tell Muslims to kill and rape innocent non-Muslims, including their wives and daughters, according to Islam Watch.

"Because non-Muslims are never innocent, they are guilty of denying Allah and his prophet," the Imam says, according to the report. "If you don't believe me, here is the legal authority, the top Muslim lawyer of Britain."

The lawyer, Anjem Choudary, backs up the Imam's position, saying that all Muslims are innocent.

"You are innocent if you are a Muslim," Choudary tells the BBC. "Then you are innocent in the eyes of God. If you are not a Muslim, then you are guilty of not believing in God."

Note that this isn't some non-Muslim claiming that Muslims think a certain way; it's a Muslim imam, not in Saudi Arabia or Sudan, but in Britain, basically giving other Muslims the go ahead to rape and murder non-Muslims in the name of Islam.

Now, is this what the majority of Muslims across the world believe? Probably not. But, is it probably what, let's say, 10%, 15%, 20% of Muslims believe? Is this what the "We want Sharia, it's okay to use suicide bombers against Israel, and Osama Bin Laden is a good man" crowd thinks? Yes -- and incidentally, those percentages may look small, but when you consider that worldwide, there are roughly 1.3 billion Muslims, we're probably talking about 100 million to 250+ million Muslims who think this way.

Can we tell the Muslims who think like that apart from the majority of Muslims who don't agree with them? No, because Islamo-Fascists believe that Islam sanctions lying to non-believers. Moreover, members of the "honor killings and clitorectomies crowd", just like Abdul Makin and Anjem Choudary, often seem to end up in positions where they can influence and/or manipulate other Muslims into seeing things from their point of view. That's a dangerous situation because one radical Muslim running a mosque may create thousands of people who think the same way he does in a few years time -- and as we've seen time and time again, the moderate Muslims who stand up to people like this are the praiseworthy exceptions, not the rule.

So if, let's say, the beginning ratio of immigrants to a country is 4 moderate Muslims for every radical Islamist who thinks it's okay to do anything to people who aren't Muslims, I think Western nations, including America, need to start having a serious discussion about the unique risk posed by bringing in large numbers of Muslims immigrants.