When it comes to conservative women, liberals are a perverse and hypocritical bunch. As a general rule, they either insist that conservative women are hideously ugly or alternately get down in the gutter and aim everything from crude comments, to porn fantasies, to rape threats at the very same women.
Meanwhile, the very same libs who are the first ones to yell "sexist" at the top of their lungs when the mildest gibe is tossed at a woman on the Left, either keep their mouths shut or laugh along at the most grotesque, sexual insults aimed at conservative women.
For the latest example of this, you can head over to the Huffington Post, where they smirk along with this graphic (which I've blurred) that is featured in a piece of garbage called "My Wall Street Journal."
Now, if Arianna Huffington had been drawn by a conservative mag in a porn parody like this, there would be a dozen posts slamming it on the HuffPo, it would be condemned all across the left-side of the blogosphere, and the cartoonist who drew this would probably be Keith Olbermann's "worst person in the world" tonight.
But, conservatives are just supposed to put up with crap. Well, I have a better idea. Manhattan Media owns the paper that put this crap out. They own a lot of magazines in New York. If you're advertising in any of their publications, pull your advertising and tell them why. Moreover, everyone should contact their CEO, Tom Allon, and let him know what you think about the kind of abusive, masturbatory fantasies for liberals that he's responsible for putting out,
Tom Allon
President/CEO
T 212.284.9712
tallon@manhattanmedia.com
|
Score:
John Hawkins | 07:55 AM |
(0)
Oh, and to pre-empt: CHERRY PICKING!!1
Posted by smelvertising
2008-04-15 07:07:18
Posted by Don_cos
2008-04-15 07:17:18
Geez, just more of the same, frankly this just shows what I've thought for at least a decade, most liberals, mentally, are still in high school.
Posted by mipt
2008-04-15 07:42:06
But seriously, that sort of thing is unacceptable no matter what woman it's done too (unless she is a porn star type involved in the adult industry), and then, while I may not like it, she at least knows what she's getting into and is getting something for it in compensation.
It's much like Randi Rhodes coming out of left field with the whore comments. There (as far as I know) hasn't been anything to suggest that Anne engages in this sort of behavior. She just says things they don't like. If they want to criticize her, they should do so based on those criticisms not by pulling something degrading clear out of left field (pun intended?).
Posted by aharris
2008-04-15 09:03:04
What is Fox New? If you're going to publish a misogynist and mean-spirited parody, you would think they might try to get the spelling right. What a bunch of retards.
Posted by Mike_M
2008-04-15 09:12:04
But this is just a tad over the line.
Posted by Rorschach
2008-04-15 09:31:23
Posted by aharris
2008-04-15 09:32:12
April 15, 2008 9:33 AM
Ah yes, that reminds me... We should give the moonbat who produced this drawing a tiny bit of credit: unlike many of his ilk, at least he's acknowledging that Ms. Coulter is, in fact, a female.
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 09:43:57
John, are you suggesting that if Ms. Coulter were to say that the Jersey Girls were enjoying their husband's deaths, she would receive her own death and rape threats and liberal politicians in New Jersey would threaten to use the power of government to have her books banned?
Are you seriously suggesting that Liberals would actually do this????
{/sarcasm off}
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 09:44:32
Posted by Social_Conservative
2008-04-15 09:47:33
Now let me get this straight:
Your list of favorite movies spills enough blood to float the Titanic, but you are so offended by a pencil drawing of a womans bosoms that you have to blur it out. Kinda creepy.
Posted by toddl
2008-04-15 10:04:25
You do know that the case was dropped and she was cleared of all charges.
Right?
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 10:10:50
That's nice, sweetpea. Its unoriginal, but still...
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 10:10:50
April 15, 2008 10:04 AM
LOL. You might have an argument if Mr. Hawkins had provided a visual depiction from each of the movies on his list.
Btw- How do you know that they're so violent unless you've seen them yourself?
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 10:18:02
This is not a porn site, Todd. Keep you fantasy's to yourself.
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 10:18:50
Posted by Ilaugh
2008-04-15 10:23:12
April 15, 2008 10:04 AM |
Just goes to show how fucking stupid you are. He blurred it out because unlike you people do work and read this blog at work. That would be considered porn and be against most company's usage policy.
I don't know if its funny or retarded how you think Mr. Hawkins is offended by the picture.....
Posted by bokchoy
2008-04-15 10:29:50
I can't even begin to express how boring you are!
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 10:44:08
Neither have reacted with the hissing vitriol or petty legal threats which are so common to Liberal ( ahem) males.
I think the reason that we see this kind of incivility and disrespect from leftist males is that we are dealing with a generation of left which are really not liberals but some type of politically indoctrinated nihilist-statists...the invective is just conditioned response as opposed to reasoned argument. Of course the use of slurs and insults is reflexive debating tech with conditioned leftbots when confronted with arguments they have no answer for. If the argument comes from a female conservative , expect degenerate slurs focused at her gender.
I think one of our Canadian conservative lady bloggers stated the case well when she (Kathy Shaidle) said:
"That such immature, unsophisticated, poorly-read, literal minded folks are allowed to vote and reproduce distresses me enormously."
She is right in identifying what we face on the new left...a culture of "immature, unsophisticated, poorly-read, literal minded" child-men indoctrinated in a fantasy political religion and conditioned to be uncivilly vicious/treacherous in defending its fallacious dogma.
PJ O'Rourke called them foul mouthed teens with a free car and ample allowance the nanny state bought them.
Both analogies seem to explain the immature disrespect for women who think outside their preconditioned realities.
Posted by WL_Mackenzie_Redux
2008-04-15 10:44:38
Neither have reacted with the hissing vitriol or petty legal threats which are so common to Liberal ( ahem) males.
I think the reason that we see this kind of incivility and disrespect from leftist males is that we are dealing with a generation of left which are really not liberals but some type of politically indoctrinated nihilist-statists...the invective is just conditioned response as opposed to reasoned argument. Of course the use of slurs and insults is reflexive debating tech with conditioned leftbots when confronted with arguments they have no answer for. If the argument comes from a female conservative , expect degenerate slurs focused at her gender.
I think one of our Canadian conservative lady bloggers stated the case well when she (Kathy Shaidle) said:
"That such immature, unsophisticated, poorly-read, literal minded folks are allowed to vote and reproduce distresses me enormously."
She is right in identifying what we face on the new left...a culture of "immature, unsophisticated, poorly-read, literal minded" child-men indoctrinated in a fantasy political religion and conditioned to be uncivilly vicious/treacherous in defending its fallacious dogma.
PJ O'Rourke called them foul mouthed teens with a free car and ample allowance the nanny state bought them.
Both analogies seem to explain the immature disrespect for women who think outside their preconditioned realities.
Posted by WL_Mackenzie_Redux
2008-04-15 10:44:40
Neither have reacted with the hissing vitriol or petty legal threats which are so common to Liberal (ahem) males.
I think one of our Canadian conservative lady bloggers stated the case well when she (Kathy Shaidle) said:
"That such immature, unsophisticated, poorly-read, literal minded folks are allowed to vote and reproduce distresses me enormously."
She is right in identifying what we face on the new left...a culture of "immature, unsophisticated, poorly-read, literal minded" child-men indoctrinated in a fantasy political religion and conditioned to be uncivilly vicious/treacherous in defending its fallacious dogma.
PJ O'Rourke called them foul mouthed teens with a free car and ample allowance the nanny state bought them.
Both analogies seem to explain the immature disrespect for women who think outside their preconditioned realities.
Posted by WL_Mackenzie_Redux
2008-04-15 10:45:00
Then you need to understand something.
This is not about censorship or trying to have this type of base and juvinile thing stopped.
It is about the obvious double standard that is the hallmark of liberalism today. For example:
•It is good political discourse to call George Bush a racist for making a campaign speech at Bob Jones University, but it is out-of-bounds to call Obama a racist on the evidence of his 20 year association with an admitted racist.
•It is good political discourse to call George Bush a liar because the Iraq war didn't go as originally planned, but Bill Clinton is an honest man in spite of his impeachment and perjury.
•It is OK to speak of Conservative women in any vile and degrading media possible, but even respectfully disagreement with a liberal woman like Hillary is sexists.
Do try and keep up, ILaughAtYOU!
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 10:47:28
Posted by Don_cos
2008-04-15 10:47:52
LOL I have many fantasies but seeing Ann Coulter nekked ain't one of them.
Posted by Jesus_Hussein_Christ
Where do I get one of those applications for redemption?
Btw- How do you know that they're so violent unless you've seen them yourself?
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
I've seen and enjoyed a lot of them, GOB.
Posted by toddl
2008-04-15 10:48:42
May I state the obvious:
Shouldn't you actually be working while you're at work?
Posted by toddl
2008-04-15 10:56:47
Posted by RAA
2008-04-15 10:59:47
Shouldn't you be paying attention in middle school instead of playing on a computer?
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 11:04:24
As if the kind of jerkoff who drew this trash actually has a real-life girlfriend. More like he was imagining a woman's body based on a single trip to a go-go bar before he was banned for bothering the dancers.
Posted by CavalierX
2008-04-15 11:10:59
April 15, 2008 11:04 AM
Don't you just hate people that answer a question with a question?
Posted by toddl
2008-04-15 11:12:43
No, but people that pretend to be better than others, while supposedly reading their minds and then demanding answers do annoy me at time, Todd.
So what are you supposed to be doing why you post your stupidity on the internet?
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 11:17:48
Posted by StanW
April 15, 2008 11:17 AM |
Well it's not the first of the month so it'sa not welfare chaeck day, so at most he's supposed to be helping his mommy do the laundry.
Posted by bthewolf
2008-04-15 11:23:35
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 11:43:30
Crackheads do laundry? Cause, seriously, that is the only thing that can explain his posts - prenatal cocaine addiction.
Posted by jasamc
2008-04-15 11:48:42
Posted by jasamc
Aw jasmac, ya hurt my feewings. You planning on giving me a good lickin' next?
So what are you supposed to be doing why you post your stupidity on the internet?
Posted by StanW
I'm a freelancer and work when work is available. You can bet I don't play on the internet then, stanley.
Posted by toddl
2008-04-15 12:21:16
Posted by Jesus_Hussein_Christ
ROFL
Posted by toddl
2008-04-15 12:28:22
The problem is, they have to be re-trained again every day.
Posted by CavalierX
2008-04-15 12:29:04
Todd, just say your unemployed and sponging off of others. No need to sugar-coat it!
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 12:49:16
Freelancer? Who else was a Freelancer?
Oh Yeah, Stephen Gobie.
Posted by Glibertarian
2008-04-15 13:06:17
Posted by toddl
April 15, 2008 12:21 PM |"
You hang around outside the Home Depot?
Don't the Mexicans resent that?
Posted by n_obrain
2008-04-15 13:13:24
Now do you see why people call you ToddlER?
And the "stanley" thing is very funny. Pick that up from FWankie, did you????
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 13:38:43
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 13:49:41
Oooooo, looks like I got all the little trollies wound up today.
How will I be able to get though the day knowing you are all so angry with me???
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 13:57:51
Posted by jimg
2008-04-15 13:59:38
April 15, 2008 1:50 PM
Same question for you as toddls. Is this an acceptable way to talk about a lady? Any lady? Or do you consider them fair game when they "get out of line"?
Please no stupid comments about how she isn't a lady. No stupid splitting hairs. Is this right or wrong. If it's not wrong, how do you justify it?
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 14:04:45
My thoughts precisely, Mr. Dalasio.
Funny (in an ironic way) how quick moonbats are to turn on minorities and women who don't "remember their place", ain't it.
Aside: So, which one of our trolls has changed his screen name to Jesus_Hussein_Christ? His posting style seems awfully familiar.
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 14:17:28
Hardly matters, GoB. From the posts above, there is barely an ounce worth of difference in the lot of them.
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 14:25:05
April 15, 2008 2:21 PM
Wow, sock-puppet, you're a real champion for women's rights aren't you? You should've told that "trash mouth attention whore" to get her arse in the kitchen and make you some pie!
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 14:29:14
Now that's funny!
Posted by CavalierX
2008-04-15 14:31:01
Good point, my friend. With the notable exceptions being: Vega, libliever and rmiller, of course.
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 14:32:32
Posted by Don_cos
2008-04-15 14:33:41
...and here lately, I'm no longer sure about Vega.
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 14:36:06
April 15, 2008 2:17 PM
Great minds obviously think alike. 87D
Posted by Jesus_Hussein_Christ
April 15, 2008 2:21 PM
So, yes or no? Is this kind of reference to a lady acceptable to you? As far as I can tell, as Good_Ol_Boy suggests, you've got no problem with it if they "mouth off".
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 14:41:32
Posted by bokchoy
2008-04-15 14:41:40
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 14:44:31
Posted by Jesus_Hussein_Christ
April 15, 2008 2:21 PM |
And we have to laugh when you call yourself intelligent.
Posted by bthewolf
2008-04-15 14:51:02
Posted by nedschnittt
2008-04-15 14:52:02
Wow! An interesting new take on the, "Your guys do it, too," defense! Impressive.
Secondly, with a trash mouth like Ann Coulter has I had to laugh when you called her a lady.
Third, Being an attention whore Ann probably is loving the publicity.
Forth, Sean Hannity has bigger boobs than Ann Coulter does in real life.
Oh, well, so much for that cleverness I thought you might possess. You carefully dodged the question you were asked, and declared that Ann Coulter isn't a lady, just as predicted.
**sigh**
Yes, the real story is the double standard. Some excellent points made by the usual folks, and somebody needs to purge that foul-mouthed troll
once and for all.
Have a great afternoon/evening!
Posted by JannyMae
2008-04-15 14:52:11
I'm the same guy I've always been. This is going to be a tough political year for all of us, so get used to it.
Posted by D-Vega
2008-04-15 14:54:28
April 15, 2008 2:52 PM,
Same sleaze from them we've come to expect.
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 14:55:43
I hope so, Vega. For the sake of both of us and our future debates.
However, I would warn you about one thing. When a worthless POS troll like M@rth@ starts taking up for you, you may be venturing too far off the reservation.
I'm just saying...
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 14:58:01
April 15, 2008 2:58 PM
To be fair, though, I don't think it's at all clear that the likes of M@rth@ have the cognitive ability to actually process a judgement as to whether it should defend something. It just senses hostility from something it opposes and responds. Sort of like subway rats.
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 15:01:30
Posted by mipt
2008-04-15 15:13:16
Posted by Jesus_Hussein_Christ
April 15, 2008 3:18 PM |
I think you really missed the sarcasm there, JHC.
Posted by bthewolf
2008-04-15 15:21:02
April 15, 2008 3:18 PM
Translation: Shut up, you uppity female, the men folk are talking! Now get your arse in the kitchen and make you some pie!
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 15:26:58
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 15:29:25
I think I see a pattern developing here, GoB. ;)
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 15:30:57
Posted by n_obrain
2008-04-15 15:34:05
An odor reminiscent of cow pie.
Posted by n_obrain
2008-04-15 15:36:23
Did someone step in some?
Posted by n_obrain
2008-04-15 15:39:46
April 15, 2008 3:34 PM
You're d*mn skippy it does.
Mmmmmm, RC... great, now I'm thirsty...
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 15:40:00
I'm ready when you are, but it seems to be a slow season as of late.
That one knows I am not in her camp.
Posted by D-Vega
2008-04-15 15:52:27
The Coulter pic is obivously offensive, but when you read the article you'll find the entire publication is supposed to be offensive on purpose. It was not just about Coulter, it was offensive period.
If people don't like it, they won't buy it and it will die. Giving it free publicity is what these people want and you are only giving them the satisfaction.
Ms. Coulter is a public figure and is pretty tough. I'm sure she can deal with something so trivial and meaningless.
Posted by D-Vega
2008-04-15 15:58:33
Is 'Radar' (which I admit that I've never even heard of) a conservative magazine? Is it the equivalent of the Huffington Post?
Posted by Good_Ol_Boy
2008-04-15 16:01:18
Posted by D-Vega
2008-04-15 16:11:43
Funny how you keep using non-political or non-partisan satire magazines as your defense against a highly political and partisan slur against a Conservative.
Must be hard for you to continue to defend this, Hussien.
Posted by StanW
2008-04-15 16:16:50
Posted by Jesus_Hussein_Christ
April 15, 2008 3:31 PM |
Only on your part.
Posted by bthewolf
2008-04-15 16:26:59
This piece on Coulter is not.
A more apt comparison would be The American Conservative's cover photo of Giuliani as Adolf Hitler. Not funny. Pretty offensive. No one cared about that and no one should really care about this.
Posted by D-Vega
2008-04-15 16:35:29
April 15, 2008 4:35 PM
I'd say that was a pretty apt comparison, D-Vega. But, I recall noting that it was sleazy and scummy in that case. Really, these sort of gutter attacks say a lot more about the authors than they do about the target.
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 17:09:42
Posted by bokchoy
No, not at all. I just enjoy being my own boss.
Posted by toddl
2008-04-15 17:43:49
Posted by whatwouldJesusdo
2008-04-15 17:45:28
Posted by smelvertising
2008-04-15 17:49:57
And if the Left made a cartoon [which they did] of Coulter or Malkin or someone else on the Right then the Right would be upset.
I mean, what's the big deal? Yes, people get upset when one of their own gets bashed in a sexist cartoon. So what?
How boring and unreasonable. Get over it.
It's a freakin cartoon!
Personally, I find it funny either way. Make cartoons of Randi Rhodes or Hillary for that matter - you have my permission.
Posted by Left_Turn
2008-04-15 18:06:54
I found it tacky and tasteless, and I disagree: You aren't going to see this kind of trash directed at Hillary or Randi Rhodes because conservatives simply have more class than to stoop to this sort of infantile boilerplate.
And by the way, we are glad you have granted your "permission" to draw cartoons, but I don't think anyone actually asked for it.
Posted by cylarz
2008-04-15 20:36:07
April 15, 2008 6:06 PM
Speaking for myself, I'll have to turn down your generous offer. Calling a woman a "whore" for the sin of having opinions I don't like strikes me as just too unmanly for my blood.
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 20:37:25
Bill_Dalasio
Et al.
A simple Google search of Hillary and 'whore' will reveal more than Randi Rhodes. Or worse. I easily found a photo of Hillary's head on a naked body [a real one - not a drawing] at a Right Wing site called Americaphile. They also call her a closet lesbian. Since it's not a safe image I'll leave you to find it.
Anyway, let's not play this holier-than-thou game. I know many conservatives that can [and do] talk dirty, mean-spririted and tasteless about the Liberals they hate. And, you know what? Despite the low grade humor it's usually humorous.
Posted by Left_Turn
2008-04-15 21:02:04
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 21:22:36
It works essentially the same in the African American community, i.e. Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell, if an African American dare shows any leanings towards conservatism, they're condemned as "Uncle Toms" and so forth.
Maybe this comes from the need of the left to have minorities under their thumb for them to survive politically, without the "plantation", the left would be as useless as Huffington herself.
Posted by sproe98
2008-04-15 21:47:08
Maybe you are decent and fair. But that's not my point. My point is that human beings in general make gross, rauchy, unfair and mean attacks. And it has nothing to do with Liberals or Conservatives. You've got to be kidding if you think Conservatives never do this!
Where you do you live?
Man, the Conservatives I know are as dirty mouthed as any Liberal I know.
The whore stuff is EASY to find. Here's one at
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WonqgRpvTk">YouTube
I gave you one blog name. Go look it up. I'm not kidding when I say it took less than a minute doing a google search to find. I don't want to link to it because it's NSFW. [I also don't want the comment deleted, which happened once when I tried to cite a Right Wing link that was ugly].
Posted by Left_Turn
2008-04-15 22:01:46
April 15, 2008 10:01 PM
We seem to be arguing at cross purposes here. I have no doubt in my mind that there are conservatives who act like complete and total douches. We're human. And flawed. Without checking (I'll take your word for it.) fine. I have no respect for that site, either. As human beings (not conservatives or liberals) we have a responsibility - yes the Youtube video is reprehensible - to try to stand up for what is right. But, don't dismiss the right because some of your opponnent choose to live in the sewer. Find the ones whose decency and reason you can appeal to. But, for the love God, at least note evil when you see it.
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 22:27:01
Posted by smelvertising
April 15, 2008 5:49 PM |"
A veritable circus of sockpuppettry.
Posted by n_obrain
2008-04-15 22:33:32
Posted by Left_Turn
April 15, 2008 9:02 PM |"
We are holier than you reactionary leftists.
Not in the religious sense, in the sense of being better than your bunch of thugs.
Posted by n_obrain
2008-04-15 22:36:25
Never heard of it.
I have, however heard of hate sites like Kos, Huffpo and DU.
Posted by n_obrain
2008-04-15 22:38:36
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-15 22:56:59
April 15, 2008 11:40 PM
Sorry, but you have attached "republican" to list of people haveing nothing to do with it. I can do the same with loose connections to democrats and be just like you.
Posted by tblrk2006
2008-04-15 23:54:59
I might have spent a few minutes reading your post if you hadn't hurled your credibility into the cosmos with that one.
Posted by Glibertarian
2008-04-16 00:15:45
Wepped?
What the fuck is wepped?
Are you pathetically trying to say wept?
What are you an asshole?
Posted by Glibertarian
2008-04-16 00:19:07
If American judges had come to the conclusion that Dick Cheney had ordered the rape of children, then it would have been the biggest news story of the year.
Not only that but he'd probably be your cell mate.
And you'd be his bitch.
Posted by Glibertarian
2008-04-16 00:24:04
Posted by ivyleaguer
2008-04-16 00:26:42
First of all, if you want to gain any credibility, rather than be made fun of, you may find it helpful to do something other than cut and paste from a liberal blog. It's boring. More directly, your list has nothing to do with the argument! The question is whether or not it's acceptable to reference a lady in the sort of terms that the author of the piece in question is using. I think its more than a little obvious from your attempts to change the subject that you understand that it is not. You simply don't care that your side is making a waterbed out of a cesspool.
Posted by Bill_Dalasio
2008-04-16 06:51:40
Posted by B_Hussein_Obama
2008-04-16 09:14:28
Posted by Jvette
2008-04-16 13:03:33
Posted by Ilaugh
2008-04-16 22:03:29
Posted by Left_Turn
April 15, 2008 6:06 PM
Your elitism is showing. I didn't realize we needed your permission.
Posted by Kingfisher
2008-04-17 00:29:31
Posted by toddl
April 15, 2008 12:21 PM
I thought "working freelance" on street corners was illegal.
Posted by Kingfisher
2008-04-17 00:32:35