ad banner for The Conservative Bog
AdvertisingConservative GrapevineEmailFAQHomeForumRSSYouTubeTownhall
 
The home of America's Ambassador of Whoop@ss!



« Can We Stop Pretending That Terrorism Isn't A Mostly Muslim Phenomenon? | Main | A Short State Of The 2008 GOP Race Update »
November 12, 2007
John Hawkins Bernard Kerik & Rudy Giuliani's Poor Judgment

As most of you probably already know, Bernard Kerik is facing some rather severe legal troubles,

"Bernard Kerik lied, schemed and sold out the city - all under the nose of his mentor and pal, presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani.

That is the stark portrait painted in the 16-count indictment unsealed yesterday in White Plains Federal Court almost exactly one year before Election Day 2008.

While the political fallout remains uncertain, the effect on Kerik's image as a Sept. 11 hero is devastating.

In meticulous detail, Manhattan U.S. Attorney Michael Garcia assembled count after count painting Kerik as a money-grubbing liar who tried to cover his tracks.

The indictment says the misdeeds took place as Giuliani promoted his former driver to the top levels of his administration, from running city prisons to heading the largest police force in America.

Yesterday, Kerik, 52, stood ramrod straight in a white shirt, red tie and navy blue jacket to declare "not guilty, your honor" in court, moments before being freed on a $500,000 bail bond backed up by his New Jersey mansion.

Outside, he could not resist bringing up Sept. 11: "The worst challenges until this time were my challenges during and after 9/11. This is a battle I'm going to fight."

The indictment charges Kerik with conspiracy, tax fraud, making false statements and depriving the city of his honest services. If convicted, he faces up to 142 years in prison and up to $4.75 million in fines."

Folks, this doesn't just reflect poorly on Bernard Kerik, it raises serious questions about Rudy Giuliani.

Bernard Kerik is not just some tangential figure in Rudy Bernard Giuliani's life: Rudy was Kerik's patron, business partner, and friend. Not only did Rudy promote him in his administration in New York, he recommended him to be the Secretary of Homeland Security.

People have taken shots at Hillary -- and rightfully so -- over the sleazy people she's connected to like Norman Hsu and Sandy Berger, but this is far worse, because Kerik is so tightly tied to Giuliani.

It raises a lot of troubling questions, like was Giuliani aware that he was working closely with someone faced with troubling ethical questions? If not, why wasn't Kerik properly vetted and how many other people with ethical problems are connected to Rudy? If Rudy was aware that Kerik may have been dirty, does that mean Rudy has ethical issues of his own or is tolerant of people who are dirty? Either way, you have to admit that it's entirely possible that there are more people with serious ethical issues surrounding Rudy.

Folks, you should be aware that Rudy now has an enormous bullseye on his back on the ethics issue and every mainstream media publication in America is probably assigning people to go through his background and the background of everyone associated with him using a fine tooth comb.

If you think you're tired of hearing the words "culture of corruption" now, you just wait and see how you feel about it if Rudy's the nominee and there turns out to be 3 or 4 characters as shady as Kerik connected to him. It will be a disaster -- and, yes, it may very well happen.

Rate this article:

Rating: 1.0/5 (1 vote cast)

BlinklistBlogMarksdel.icio.usDiggFurlMagnoliaNewsvineRedditStumbleuponTechnorati
    Share this article!
John Hawkins | 08:02 AM | Permalink   Comments (24)   Trackbacks (0)

Note: Comments and Trackbacks for this entry closed on November 17, 2007 08:02 AM Most commented on recent posts
  AP: It's Racist to Mention Obama's Terrorist Ties (140 comments)
  Live Blogging The Vice Presidential Debate (138 comments)
  Obama Funny Business (136 comments)
  Liveblogging The Presidential Debate (129 comments)
  Ok, Not To Depress You, But... (75 comments)
  A Short Debate Analysis: The Winner Is... (71 comments)
  Barack Obama Was a Member of Radical Left New Party (71 comments)
  Who is Barack Obama, and what does he stand for? (69 comments)
  Q&A Friday #95 (58 comments)
  "In 100 Words Or Less: What's Wrong With The World?" (54 comments)

Highest rated recent posts
  So That's What Community Organizers Do [4.5 stars]
  Barack Obama In Quotes Version 3.0 [4.3 stars]
  The Law of Unintended Consequences Strikes Again [4.1 stars]
  Intellectualism & Sarah Palin: Or How The Smarty Pants Set Are Threatened By Someone Who Knows Sense [4.1 stars]
  Video Of The Day: The Opening Of Idiocracy [3.9 stars]
  I Have 4 Words For You: "We Can't Afford It." [3.9 stars]
  A Short Debate Analysis Of The 2nd McCain Vs. Obama Debate. [3.9 stars]
  Day By Day's Chris Muir Writes About......Me?! [3.9 stars]
  Q&A Friday #95: Why Are You Running Ads For Left-Wing Groups? [3.8 stars]
  Quote Of The Day: The Danger Ahead [3.8 stars]
  Q&A Friday #95: If You Could Enact A Single Piece Of Legislation, What Would It Be? [3.8 stars]

ad banner for Survey
© Copyright 2001-2008 John Hawkins
eXTReMe Tracker