Harvard Study Finds Repressing Gun Rights Does Not Reduce Violence
Even Ivy League eggheads have figured out that restricting gun rights does not reduce violent crime:
A Harvard Study titled “Would Banning Firearms Reduce Murder and Suicide?” looks at figures for “intentional deaths” throughout continental Europe and juxtaposes them with the U.S. to show that more gun control does not necessarily lead to lower death rates or violent crime.
Because the findings so clearly demonstrate that more gun laws may in fact increase death rates, the study says that “the mantra that more guns mean more deaths and that fewer guns, therefore, mean fewer deaths” is wrong.
By some remarkable coincidence, Norway “has far and away Western Europe’s highest household gun ownership rate (32%), but also its lowest murder rate.”
The murder rate in Russia, where handguns are banned, is 30.6; the rate in the U.S. is 7.8.
support the contention that among the nations studied, those with more gun control tend toward higher death rates.
Just like John Lott has been telling us for years.
Next Harvard should do a study on what motivates liberal authoritarians to want us disarmed, since it obviously isn’t concern for our safety.
Joe Geoghagan is a 31 year old veteran and he’s begging the VA not to let him starve to death. Let me repeat that. Joe Geoghagan is a 31 year...Read More
When liberals were demanding new gun control laws after Sandy Hook, the NRA not only opposed them, it offered up
It has been three and a half years since I first covered the case of a Washington State prosecutor targeting
Short answer? PROBABLY not. At first glance, it does seem more than a bit strange that the government is buying