IPCC Admits That They’re Not A Scientific Organization

10 Feb, 2010 by Melissa Clouthier

Print this article Font size -16+

AJ Strata makes this stunning find from The Guardian:

The IPCC says its reports are policy relevant, but not policy prescriptive. Perhaps unknown to many people, the process is started and finished not by scientists but by political officials, who steer the way the information is presented in so-called summary for policymakers [SPM] chapters. Is that right, the Guardian asked?

“The Nobel prize was for peace not science … government employees will use it to negotiate changes and a redistribution of resources. It is not a scientific analysis of climate change,” said Anton Imeson, a former IPCC lead author from the Netherlands. “For the media, the IPCC assessments have become an icon for something they are not. To make sure that it does not happen again, the IPCC should change its name and become part of something else. The IPCC should have never allowed itself to be branded as a scientific organisation. It provides a review of published scientific papers but none of this is much controlled by independent scientists.”

WHAT?!

The IPCC was branded as a scientific organization? It passed itself off as a scientific organization.

So what was it? A political organization? AJ says:

Think about this for a moment. Now the IPCC insiders are admitting they cannot ’settle the science’ because they don’t do science and most of their ‘message’ is crafted by policy makers (with agendas of course).

Political activism masquerading as science to influence governments and create a new economic structure to control people’s energy consumption aka lives.

And it almost worked.