Liberals and Commies, which are basically the same thing at this point, love them some population control. Whether you’re talking Malthus, Paul Ehrlich, Planned Parenthooc, or China’s one child policy, liberals are forevermore yearning to cull the human herd. There’s just something about massive numbers of human beings disappearing into the ether that makes liberal hearts beat faster.
That brings us to Al Gore, who, in the name of global warming, is continuing the great liberal obsession with population control.
One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principle ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children have, the spacing of the children.
You have to lift child survival rates so that parents feel comfortable having small families and most important — you have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.
Yes, we’ve got to limit the human population to fight non-existent global warming. Of course, if global warming didn’t exist, Gore would, like most liberals, still be hellbent on reducing the population — the excuse for it would just be different.
I wonder what Al Gore’s 4 children, Karenna, Kristin, Sarah, and Albert think of that idea? Which of those children should Al Gore have not had to save the earth….or wait, is this just another one of those things that apply to the little people, but not hypocritical liberals like Al Gore?