Team Obama Refuses To Condemn Union Violence Threats In Michigan
So glad that Team Obama cares about a civil society after he whipped up the crowd during an appearance in Michigan on Monday
(Daily Caller) White House spokesman Jay Carney declined to condemn the increasing violence and threats by union members in Michigan, merely telling reporters Tuesday that “the president believes in debate that’s civil.”
When asked by a reporter about a claim by Michigan state Democrat that “there will be blood” should Republicans pass a union-choice law in Michigan, Carney professed ignorance and then downplayed the comment.
“I haven’t see those comments, and I’m not sure they mean what someone interprets them to mean,” he said.
Of course, the loony tunes on the Left are pushing a “false flag” narrative
When I saw this video—claiming that a “violent mob” destroyed the tent the Koch brothers had paid for in front of the Michigan Capitol—I knew right away it was likely a false flag. After all, Stranahan, James O’Keefe’s buddy, first posted it. Within minutes it was up at Drudge.
So, those weren’t union goons violently assaulting people? In fact, two of the union thugs have been identified. And every time we see this kind of violence it comes from Democrat voters.
Now we await to see what Jay Carney and/or Obama will say regarding the violence today, if any White House reporter is willing to ask.
Yeah, yeah, I know I really shouldn’t call it ObamaCare, since, like virtually every other policy, Obama gives a speech
Despite finding saarin, mustard gas, and other chemical weapons, and despite various prison sentences for those who used them in Iraq or those who sold them, apparently, the only thing that would have satisfied the left that Saddam had WMDs would have been discovering a giant SPECTRE-sized Ken Adam-styled laboratory with men in white lab coats hard at work caught in the act. But as Elizabeth Blackney, AKA “Media Lizzy” notes on her Facebook page, my how the definition of WMDs has changed…
The Hill conducted its annual survey of how congressmen feel about each other and the answers are instructive. The survey