AP’s False Claim That ‘Some’ Democrats Open to Entitlement Cuts


In a November 28 article, the Associated Press tried to give cover to Democrats by insisting that they are somehow divided over cuts in entitlements to help solve the “fiscal cliff” problem. But the truth is, Democrats are united against these cuts, not divided.

In its piece headlined, “It’s Not Just Taxes: Benefit Cuts Divide Democrats,” the AP attempted to demonstrate a “division” that doesn’t exist by citing two Democrats that meekly offered to consider cuts to entitlements.

It’s not just about taxes. There’s another big obstacle to overcome as Congress and President Barack Obama work to skirt the fiscal cliff: deep divisions among Senate Democrats over whether to consider cuts to popular benefit programs like Medicare and Medicaid.

This is flat out absurd. There are no deep divisions among Democrats over cuts to these programs. In fact, just the opposite.

This tall tale goes on to present the weak claims of “considering” cuts to these programs uttered by Senator Max Baucus (D, Montana) and Kent Conrad (D, N.D.). But one, Conrad, is retiring and the other has no support from his fellows — especially Democrat leadership — for the idea.

Despite the AP’s claims that there are “divisions” over such cuts, the real story is that Democrats have a large and growing coalition refusing to go for any cuts at all.

There were reports that Dick Durbin (D, IL), the Senate majority’s number three man, made some noise about “reforming” Medicare but that suggestion did not include any cuts at all. Further he offered no actual plan, he just gave lip service to the idea of “reform” without making any substantive policy suggestions. That way he got to sound reasonable without having had the discomfort of thinking too hard about his suggestions.

Quixotically, even as its own report begins on such a false note, the AP story goes on to prove just the opposite of its starting premise saying, “But senators like Baucus and Conrad increasingly are being drowned out by other Democrats emboldened by the recent election results to fight against benefit cuts.”

In any case, the false premise that the AP was trying to float was that there are Democrats other than the two they mentioned urging spending cuts, but there just aren’t enough to prove “deep divisions.” Having one or two or even ten saying that entitlement spending cuts should be on the table when the other 90 percent of the party says “no” does not show any such “deep divisions.”

Also see...

Warner Todd Huston

Warner Todd Huston

Warner Todd Huston is a Chicago-based freelance writer, has been writing opinion editorials and social criticism since early 2001 and is featured on many websites such as Andrew Breitbart's BigGovernment.com, BigJournalsim.com and all Breitbart News' other sites, RightWingNews.com, CanadaFreePress.com, and many, many others. Additionally, he has been a frequent guest on talk-radio programs across the country to discuss his opinion editorials and current events as well as appearing on TV networks such as CNN, Fox News, Fox Business Network, and various Chicago-based news programs. He has also written for several history magazines and appears in the book "Americans on Politics, Policy and Pop Culture" which can be purchased on amazon.com. He is also the owner and operator of PubliusForum.com. Feel free to contact him with any comments or questions : EMAIL Warner Todd Huston and follow him on Twitter, on Google Plus , and Facebook.

Related Articles

7

Admission: Journalists are Liberals Not Interested in Facts and Truth

Polk Award-Winning Rolling Stone writer Michael Hastings made a startling set of admissions on CSPAN, recently. Not only did he

6

Illinois Rep. Halvorson: Tea Partiers are ‘Fringe’

Attention citizens of Illinois 11th Congressional District. If you have attended a Tea Party event or are inclined to support

0

Russian Intelligence Moves Back Into Cuba

By: Terresa Monroe-Hamilton NoisyRoom.net Russia’s President Vladimir Putin (left) hugs Cuba’s President Raul Castro after a meeting at the Revolution