Send US Troops to Ukraine


Do our treaty commitments mean anything? Are they worth the paper upon which they are written? In 1994, President Clinton, British Prime Minister Major, Russian President Yeltsin, and Ukrainian President Kuchma signed The Budapest Memorandum pledging themselves and their nations to “respect the independence and sovereignty and the existing borders of Ukraine.”

Dick Morris 3

The treaty was signed as part of a successful effort to persuade Ukraine to relinquish its nuclear stockpile, armaments stationed there when the Soviet Union broke up. In return for the joint guarantee, Ukraine promised to give up its nuclear weapons.

It’s there in black and white: an American commitment we must honor.

With the photographs that clearly identify the “civilian pro-Russian demonstrators” occupying Ukrainian buildings as Russian soldiers and security agents, the fact of a Russian invasion is not hypothetical. It is real.

When I asked President Clinton why he was so anxious to bring Hungary and the Czech Republic into NATO, he spoke of the importance of maintaining freedom in those countries, but also said that we needed “a land bridge” to Ukraine. “Ukraine,” he said, “is key. We have to make sure they can stay independent.”

(At the time, there was real fear of a communist comeback in Russia and Clinton was heavily influenced by former President Nixon’s advice to be sure he wouldn’t be the president to “lose” Russia as Truman had “lost” China.)

If the U.S. led it, NATO would surely be willing to follow and deploy at least a token force from every European nation.

There is no way Russia would attack Ukraine if it meant war with the United States. Just as the tripwire defense we maintained in Germany throughout the Cold War did not cost us a single U.S. life and not one shot was fired in anger, so a robust show of support for Ukraine would not lead to war. It would avert one.

If we do not stop Russia in Ukraine, Putin will attack Azerbaijan, Moldova and the Baltic States. If we do not stop him there, Poland and Eastern Europe could well be next.

We all know the story of how Allied refusal to intervene catalyzed Hitler’s push for European domination. We all realize now that a show of force when Hitler marched into the Rhineland or into Austria would have averted World War II.

Our successful deployment in Germany throughout the Cold War gives us ample evidence that you can face down the Russians without loss of life. Putin will take what we give him as long as its free, but not at the price of war. His own people would not tolerate Russia getting into a war. My work in Russian politics (for Yeltsin in the ’90s) left me with a strong impression that the fear of war with the U.S. is uppermost in Russian minds and the memories of World War II have not receded.

And, we gave our word to Ukraine. What is that worth?

Also see,

Packing the Popular Vote

Also see...

Related Articles

11

The Top 20 Most Influential Black Republicans

Deciding who’s the “most influential” anything is inherently an arbitrary business. It’s even more difficult in this case, when we’re

0

100 Years is Enough For Me, Pal

Here’s one potential advance in science that has me worried: human beings may eventually live a really long time. According

0

Hillary Clinton’s ‘social gospel’ good enough for Democrats

Faith is making a comeback among liberal Democrats, but they still have a way to go. First, some history. Hoping