Obama’s Plan to Censor the News Media
The Federal Communications Commission is about to launch a direct assault on the freedom of media to cover news as it chooses. The program, called the Multi-Market Study of Critical Information Needs involves requesting information from all radio and television stations — and newspapers — about how they cover news, who decides what gets covered, and what criteria they use in the decision. The FCC will also conduct a “content analysis” of one week’s coverage to decide whether each of eight “critical” categories of news are being given adequate attention.
While the results of the study will not impose mandatory changes on the media’s news decisions, the recommendations of the FCC will carry the weight of law since all radio and television stations must come up for license renewals every eight years. Newspapers — which are clearly outside the jurisdiction of the FCC — are under no such constraint, but will be evaluated anyway.
The study is in response to another study, this one conducted by the Annenberg School for Communications and Journalism at the University of Southern California, which found that minorities were not being adequately served by media news and that critical areas were being underreported.
No surprise, the “critical areas” include such liberal topics as the environment and economic opportunity.
The first market to undergo a grilling will be Columbia, S.C., but all areas of the country are slated to come in for scrutiny
Surveys will be distributed to reporters, news editors, assignment editors, publishers, owners, on-air reporters, film editors and other station or newspaper staff. These are the questions they will ask:
–What is the news philosophy of the station?
–Who else in your market provides news?
–Who are your main competitors?
–Is the news produced in-house or is it provided by an outside source?
–Do you employ news people?
–How many reporters and editors do you employ?
–Do you have any reporters or editors assigned to topic “beats”? If so how many and what are the beats?
–Who decides which stories are covered?
–How much influence do reporters and anchors have in deciding which stories to cover? –How much does community input influence news coverage decisions?
–How do you define critical information that the community needs?
–How do you ensure the community gets this critical information? On-Air Staff? Reporters? Anchors?
–How much news does your station air every day?
–Have you ever suggested coverage of what you consider a story with critical information for your customers (viewers, listeners, readers) that was rejected by management? If so, can you give an example? What was the reason given for the decision? Why do you disagree?
These intrusive questions, prying into station politics and policies, can only send a chilling message to radio and television outlets.
If radio and television stations do not do a good job of reporting news, their ratings will suffer. If they do not do a good job of reporting the news the government wants them to report, that’s none of the government’s business.
The day is long gone when communities were dependent on one radio or one television station or one newspaper for their news. The Internet and cable television has changed all that. But the FCC acts as if the new age has not dawned.
Is it that they don’t know? Or is it, more likely, that they want to push the media to cover the Obama administration agenda.
As this project goes forth, Senator Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., is circulating a petition in Congress to urge the networks to devote more time to covering climate change.
The First Amendment is under attack!
Terrorists aren’t often accused of being particularly bright. And that dimness is on full display as a group of ISIS jihadis attempt to launch a cannon, with hilarious results. Every...Read More
Senators and governors from nine western states held a first-ever summit on Friday, April 18, in Salt Lake City,
We have entered a new phase of the endless Occupy Wall Street sleepover. Not working is hard work. After a
According to Bill O’Reilly, pundits cannot appeal to the Bible any longer for public policy regarding homosexuals that want to