“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

17

Obama’s America: Rationing Toilet Paper

Back in 2005 Democrat Senator Dick Durbin said that our soldiers were just like Nazis and were running the Soviet

56

You Can Pry My Free Dish Network Shotgun From My Cold, Dead Hands

Originally posted at NewsReal’s That’s What She Said … Business has tripled at a Montana Radio Shack offering a free

2

The Hollywood Left: America’s Shame

The Occupy movement continues to stumble across the country, prompting MTV reality show buzz : and, according to high-ranking NYC police