“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Also see...

Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

11

Video Interview: Eric O’Keefe and Getting Rid Of Obamacare With The Health Care Compact

Obamacare will sink this country if it is ever allowed to come into full operation. So says Eric O’Keefe, Chairman

21

Looks Like Obama Lost These Boobs as Fans, Anyway

The Barbi Twins are no longer big fans of the Obammessiah. They think he’s turned his back on the horses.

43

Getting Rich Off the Taxpayers: School Administrators Double Dipping Pensions

It must be nice to work for the government. Sadly it’s the most lucrative way to make a living in