“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Also see...

Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

37

Live Tweeting Obama’s Jobs Speech: More Big Government Boondoggles

As I often do, I live Tweeted Obama’s address to the joint session of congress, but for sure this speech

15

Rep. Blackburn Introduces Bill to Preempt FCC Internet Takeover

Representative Marsha Blackburn (R, TN) has introduced a bill to preempt the December power grab by Federal Communications Commission Chairman

4

Illinois: Beloved Doctor Benched For Not Being Proficient with Electronic Medical Records System

A popular, longtime Doctor from central Illinois has been sidelined by employer Springfield-based Memorial Health System because he has not