“An Audacious Promise: The Moral Case for Capitalism”


James R. Otteson:

Even if we do not all get rich at the same rate, we all still get richer. To see the importance of this point, ask yourself: If you could solve only one social ill–either inequality or poverty–which would it be? Or suppose that the only way to address poverty would be to allow inequality: Would you allow it? This seems a no-brainer: poverty is a far larger factor in human misery than is inequality. If we could have steadily fewer people suffering from grinding poverty, is that not something to wish for, even if it comes with inequality? This appears to be the position in which we find ourselves. The only way we have discovered to raise people out of poverty is the institutions of capitalism, and those institutions allow inequality. Keeping people in poverty seems too high a price to pay in the service of equality. One is tempted to say that only a person who has never experienced poverty could think differently.

Also see...

Craig Newmark

Craig Newmark

Associate Professor of Economics, North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles

0

Union Boss Says Advocates for Spending Cuts are ‘Mentally Retarded’

In a perfect example of why unions are the biggest problem for government budget reform, John Gage, President of the

34

Recovery Lagging for Middle Class

So much for Obama being the “President of the middle class”… According to the Census Bureau, income for the middle

0

Leftist Donna Brazile Warns The GOP Civil War is Over, The Tea Party Won

Old Clinton hack Donna Brazile has a message for her readers: the GOP civil war is over and the Tea